In 1987, at the height of Perestroika in the Soviet Union, another perestroika began in America. Two gay activists from Harvard University, one of whom was a public relations expert and the other a neuropsychiatrist, published an article entitled “Reorganization of heterosexual America", Which outlined the main points of the plan to transform the social values ​​of the average American and his attitude towards homosexuality. This plan has been adopted and approved in February 1988 at a “military conference” in Warrenton, where 175 leading gay activists from across the country met. Now, looking back, we can say that their plan was not only successfully implemented, but even exceeded: in the 2011 year, the Obama administration declared the “fight for the rights of sexual minorities” a priority of American foreign policy, turning America into a global hotbed of LGBT ideology, and in 2015 The U.S. Supreme Court has ordered all states to register and recognize same-sex marriage. The gay activist’s plan was detailed in a book on 400 pages “After the Ball: How America will conquer its fear and hatred of gays in 90's". LGBT activist Igor Kochetkov (a person acting as a foreign agent) in his lecture “The political power of the global LGBT movement: how activists achieved their goal” said that this work has become the “alphabet” of LGBT activists around the world, including in Russia, and many still proceed from these principles. The following are excerpts from the book and the preceding article.

«After The Ball - gay manifesto of the nineties "

Gay life in America is difficult and does not promise significant improvements unless something is urgently undertaken to change the anti-homosexual attitudes of society. According to most activists, there are two ways to free gays: enlightenment (i.e. propaganda) and politics. Distribution of propaganda is extremely expensive and difficult, so activists have focused on politics, ensuring gay rights by conspiring with the liberal elite in the legal and legislative system. Gay activists initially tried to manipulate the American judiciary on the basis of the Bill of Rights, but most courts took it cool. Therefore, many activists turned to tactics of persistent whispering in the ears of liberal and moderate civil servants at all levels of government. The goal was to conclude a deal or conspiracy with those in power to always get ahead of public opinion or completely ignore it.

Sometimes this tactic works: many executive orders and decrees (which circumvented the democratic process) adopted by city councils now protect certain gay civil rights in individual cities. Many of these victories are the reckoning of elected deputies, whose candidacy was supported by an organized gay community, thus demonstrating their electoral muscles and savvy in behind-the-scenes politics.

However, the scheme of building elite conspiracies is often impractical in the short term and imprudent in the long term. Ultimately, even if a conspiracy is formed and any legislative agreement is concluded, it will be written in beach sand. Again and again, religious conservatives washed away our achievements with a foamy wave of public outrage and protest. If the elite conspiracies are not supported by a significant shift in public opinion, they will be swept away like a house of cards at the first gust of wind from the direct opposition. Our political success can be greatly enhanced by the media campaign.

We would like to propose a well thought out and powerful strategy like the one blamed by their enemies for gay men, or, if you prefer, a plan as manipulative as our enemies.

It's time to learn from Madison Avenue [center of the advertising industry in America - approx. per.] how to use heavy artillery. Gays should launch a large-scale straight campaign in the media. We are talking about propaganda. The goal and result of pro-homosexual propaganda is to promote a climate of increased tolerance towards homosexuals, which, in our opinion, is a good thing.

The first task in this business is desensitization. [gradual dulling of sensitivity] the American public regarding gays and their rights. To desensitize the public is to help them look at homosexuality with indifference rather than emotions. Ideally, straights should treat differences in sexual preferences as differences in the taste of ice cream or sports: she loves strawberry, and I like vanilla; he loves baseball, and I love football - nothing special.

At least at the initial stage, we strive only to desensitize the public and nothing more. We don't need complete "acceptance" or "understanding" of homosexuality by the average American, nor can we count on it. You can forget about trying to convince the masses that homosexuality is a good thing, but if you can get them to think that homosexuality is just another thing that deserves nothing more than a shrug, then your battle is for legal and social rights practically won. And to achieve that shrug, gays, as a distinct class, must stop appearing mysterious, alien, disgusting and antagonistic. It will take a large-scale information campaign to change the image of gays in America. Any campaign aimed at such a coup must take the following six steps:

[1] Talk about gays and homosexuality as louder and more often

The principle underlying this advice is quite simple: almost any behavior begins to seem normal if you often encounter it in your immediate environment. The acceptability of the new behavior directly depends on the number of people who practice or accept it. At first, novelty can offend someone else's feelings. So in the old days, many were shocked by hair coloring, eating goldfish and premarital sex. However, if the average Joni does not feel the pressure to behave the same, and this behavior does not pose a threat to his physical and financial security, then he quickly gets used to it and life goes on. A conservative can still shake his head and think: “People are going crazy today,” but over time his objections will most likely become more vague, more philosophical, and less emotional.

To dull the primary sensitivity to homosexuality, it is necessary that as many people as possible talk a lot about this topic. in a neutral or approving tone. It is necessary to use the words “gay” or “lesbian”, as they sound less negative than “homosexual”. An open and frank conversation makes a sensitive topic less secret, alien, sinful, and more open. Constant conversations give the impression that public opinion on this issue is at least divided, and that a significant segment - the most advanced and modern citizens - accept or even practice homosexuality. Even the fierce debate between opponents and defenders serves the purpose of desensitization, as long as respectable gays are in the center and at the forefront, and set their tone. The main thing is to talk about homosexuality until it becomes completely tiring.

Offering “talk about homosexuality” we mean exactly that. In the early stages of the campaign, the public should not be shocked and pushed away by a premature demonstration of homosexual behavior itself. Instead, sexual images should be downplayed, and gay rights reduced as much as possible to an abstract social issue. Let the camel first stick its nose into the tent, and only then its unsightly ass.       

No less important is where we will talk about it. Visual media, film and television are by far the most powerful image makers of Western civilization. An average American family watches television for more than seven hours a day. This watch opens the door to the personal space of straights through which you can lead the Trojan horse. Desensitization will be carried out through a message about the normality of this phenomenon. So far, gay Hollywood has provided us with the best secret weapon in the battle to desensitize the general public. Gradually, over the past ten years, gay characters and gay themes have been incorporated into television programs and films. And although often this was done in order to achieve a comedic and humorous effect, the result is generally encouraging.

The prime-time film about teenage gay “Mutually agreed”, shown in prime time on the largest channel in 1985, is one of many examples of highlighting gay issues in a favorable light. But this should only be the beginning of gay America’s massive blitz.

Can a campaign of open and lengthy conversations on gay topics desensitize every ardent opponent of homosexuality? Of course not. Although public opinion is one of the main sources of generally accepted values, there is another authority - religion. When conservative churches condemn gays, we can only do two things to discourage homophobic sentiments from true believers. First, we can stir up the waters of morality. This means supporting gay gentler churches, raising our own theological objections to conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency.

Secondly, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches in the eyes of their less ardent adherents, portraying them obsolete and stagnant institutions that do not keep up with the times and with the latest conclusions of psychology. Against the atavistic craving of the religion of old times, it is necessary to establish a more powerful craving for science and public opinion (the shield and sword of the damned “secular humanism”).

Such an unholy alliance worked well against churches before, on topics such as divorces and abortions. By constantly supporting frank conversations about the prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, this alliance can work here too.

[2] Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive rivals

In any campaign for public sympathy, gays should be exposed as victims in need of protection so that straights at the level of reflex tend to take on the role of protector. If, instead, gays are presented as a strong and proud tribe promoting a clearly non-conformal and deviant lifestyle, they will most likely be perceived as a public threat that justifies resistance and oppression.

For this reason, we must give up the temptation to publicly show off our “gay pride” when it contradicts the image of a “gay victim”. We must balance on a fine line, impressing the straight people with their multiplicity, on the one hand, and not inciting their hostile paranoia - “They are everywhere!” - on the other. The purpose of the victim’s image is to make straight people feel uncomfortable, and also lay the foundation for a transformation process that will help straight people identify with gays and empathize with their oppressed status.

A campaign promoting the image of a “gay victim” in the media should use images that reduce the general public's sense of threat, reduce its vigilance and increase the likelihood of gay victimization. From a practical point of view, this means that cheeky barbel in the skin, transvestites and masculine lesbians will not appear in homosexual commercials and public appearances. Conventional images of handsome young people, older people and attractive women will take priority, not to mention the parents and heterosexual friends of gays. It can also be argued that in the early stages of a media campaign, lesbians should be represented more noticeably than gays, since the attitude of straight people to lesbians is less hostile, and their prejudices are vague and not so numerous. Women are generally perceived to be less threatening and more vulnerable than men, and therefore more likely to arouse sympathy. It goes without saying that groups located in the most remote acceptability ranges, such as NAMBLA, ^{[North American Association of Love for Men and Boys]} should not participate in such a campaign at all: potential child molesters will never look like victims.

There are two main messages about the “gay victim” that deserve communication. Firstly, it is necessary to convince the general public that gays are victims of circumstances, and that they choose their sexual orientation no more than they choose their height, skin color, talents or limitations. Despite the fact that, apparently, sexual orientation for most people is the product of complex interactions between an innate predisposition and environmental factors in childhood and early adolescence, we insist that for all practical purposes it should be considered that gays were born that way.        

While publicly recognizing that homosexuality can be a choice, we open Pandora’s box labeled “moral choice and sin,” and give the religious stubborn a whipping stick. Straights must be convinced that being homosexual is as natural for some as being heterosexual for others. Homosexuals didn’t choose anything, nobody ever fooled or seduced them.

Their occupation is not a deliberate opposition - it is natural for them, and therefore they deserve moral charges no more than heterosexuals. This is just an accident, with 1 to 10 chances that someone will be born gay and someone will be straight. Every heterosexual must believe that such a vicissitude of fate could easily happen to him.

Heterosexuals must be able to identify with gays as victims. We should not give them any additional reasons so that they can say: "They are not like us." For this, the persons involved in public campaigns must be decent, honest, attractive, worthy of respect by the standards of straight people, and completely impeccable in appearance. In a word, they must be indistinguishable from the straight people to which we want to reach. Only under such conditions will the message be read correctly: "These people are victims of evil rock, which could happen to me."

The second epistle will portray gays as victims of public prejudice. The heterosexual majority is not aware of the suffering it inflicts on gays, so it needs to show frank images of brutality towards gays, dramatize the lack of work and housing, the loss of custody of children, public humiliation and the like.

[3] Give the defenders the feeling that they are doing the right thing

An information campaign that represents gay victims of society and encourages straight people to be their advocates should help those who approve approve and explain their intercession. Not many heterosexual women, and even fewer heterosexual men, will want to openly defend homosexuality as such. Most of them will prefer to attach their awakened impulse to intercession to some general principle of justice, law or equality in society. Our campaign should not require direct support for homosexual practices; instead, anti-discrimination should be taken as the main theme. The right to freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, freedom of association, justice and equal protection by the law - this should be the focus of our campaign.

It is especially important that the gay movement takes its business to the level of generally accepted standards of law and justice, because its heterosexual supporters must have at hand convincing answers to the moral arguments of their enemies. Homo haters clothe their emotional disgust into the awesome robes of religious dogma, so gay rights advocates should be prepared to meet dogma with principle.

[4] Exposing Gays in Good Light

In order for the “gay victim” to arouse sympathy among the straight people, it must be depicted as an ordinary layman. But the additional theme of the campaign, more energetic and aggressive, should compensate for the existing negative stereotype of homosexual women and men, presenting them as the main pillars of society. Yes, yes, we know - this trick is so old that it creaks. Other minorities constantly use it in their announcements, proudly declaring: “Did you know that this great man was one of ours?” Nevertheless, such a message will be necessary for those straight people who still represent gay men as strange, lonely and suicidal renegades kidnapping children.

The honorable role of outstanding homosexual or bisexual men and women is truly amazing. From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Tchaikovsky to Bessie Smith, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Safo to Gertrude Stein - this list is well known to us, but it is shocking news for heterosexual America [in fact, allegations of many historical figures are sucked from a famous finger]. Famous historical figures are especially useful for us for two reasons: firstly, they invariably dead, like a nail, and therefore cannot deny anything or sue for defamation. 

Secondly, and more seriously, the virtues and achievements of these revered historical homosexuals cannot be challenged or taken away, since history textbooks have already firmly fixed them with indestructible cement. By aiming his blue spotlight on such revered heroes, a skillful media campaign can make the gay community look like the godfather of Western civilization in the shortest possible time.

At the same time, we should not forget about the approval from celebrities, who can be both straight and gay (as well as alive, for a change), but they must be loved and respected by the public. A gay homosexual will stifle homophobia by presenting a favorable gay image that contradicts stereotypes, and a straight person will provide the public with an impressive and emulating example of social tolerance. In any case, the psychological reaction among straights will be the same with the potential for transformation:

• I like Mr. Celeb

• Mr. Celeb is homosexual or respects homosexuals.

• So I must either stop admiring Mr. Celeb or start respecting homosexuals. [a phenomenon known as "cognitive dissonance." A good example is football player Ronaldo or the wizard Dumbledore.]

[5] Exposing Torturers in a Bad Light

At a later stage in the gay rights media campaign, after gay advertising has become commonplace, the time has come to deal with the remaining opponents. To drown them, it will be necessary to denigrate them. Our goal here is twofold. First, we seek to replace self-righteous pride with our homophobia among the general public with a sense of shame and guilt. Secondly, we intend to make anti-gay people look so disgusting that the average Americans will not want to have anything to do with them.

Images should be shown to the public of ranting homophobes, whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust Central America. These images may include:

• Ku Klux Klan, requiring gay men to be burned alive or neutered;

• Fanatical southern preachers salivating with hysterical hatred so that it looks both comical and extravagant;

• Threatening hooligans, bandits and prisoners who calmly talk about the “fagots” they killed or would like to kill;

• A tour of the Nazi concentration camps, where homosexuals were tortured and gassed.

With such tactics, we intend to make the manifestation of homophobia so unacceptable that even the most fanatical stubborn people will ultimately remain silent in public, as rabid racists and anti-Semites do today.

The trick is to make a homophobe feel a conflict of shame every time he criticizes gays. This can be achieved using the constant impact of graphic images or verbal statements incompatible with his own imaginary image of a decent person who fits into society. Thus, propaganda advertising can portray homophobes as rude and throaty bastards who say not only “fagot”, but also “black-assed”, “Jew” and other shameful epithets that are not appropriate for a Christian. You can show them how they are criticized, hated and avoided. You can portray gays experiencing terrible suffering as a direct result of homophobic intolerance [the movie "The Game of Imitation", for example] - Most homophobes are ashamed to be the cause of this suffering. In short, homophobia must be associated with all sorts of attributes that a homophobic would be ashamed to have, as well as with unpleasant and terrible social consequences for him. Thus, an attack is made on his self-esteem and the pleasure of criticism.

Remember that the homophobic seeks approval and sympathy from the public, but when he sees that someone like himself has not been approved or accepted, he begins to feel doubt and shame. Of course, the campaign to denigrate homophobia will anger our most ardent enemies. But what can be said? Called a load - climb into the back while the whole of America is watching. However, we must try to do it gradually. The media will not immediately allow direct attacks on the ultra-conservatives, but they can allow mentioning of Nazi atrocities, the pink triangle as a symbol of torment, etc. Nazi history alone will be a good start to denigrate our enemies. After all, who wants to have anything to do with the Nazis? (Argentina doesn’t count.)

[6] Raise funds

Any large-scale campaign of this kind will require unprecedented spending for months or even years to come. Effective advertising is an expensive pleasure: it will take several million dollars to get things going. 10-15 million homosexual adults live in this country. If each of them donates only two dollars for the campaign, then our budget will not be worse than that of the most vocal enemies of our business. Since gays do not need to support families and their income is usually above average, they can afford to make a much larger contribution. The new campaign should begin a coherent and nationwide fundraising with well-known and anonymous donors, both gay and straight, who are not indifferent to social justice.

In the beginning, a call to raise funds may have to be launched exclusively through the gay press - magazines, newspapers, flyers in bars, etc. Sponsoring can also come through the work of local gay organizations on university campuses and urban areas. In the end, donations will be requested in direct appeals to the central media. If the gay community cannot create the necessary capital to start the campaign, then you should not count on significant progress regarding gay rights in the near future.

Currently, LGBT funding is already being provided by global companies and countries. Details.

It is necessary to break through the media, otherwise nothing will come of it

Without access to television, radio and the central press, the campaign will not succeed. However, this is a difficult problem, as the words “gay” and “homosexual” cause an ambiguous reaction, and most media simply refuse to accept what may adversely affect the business and provoke a storm of indignation from the public and sponsors. Since the simplest appeals do not seem possible, we had to slowly negotiate with the broadcasters behind the scenes so that the issues important to the gay community receive at least some coverage. But such an arrangement is not ideal, because the image of the gay community is controlled by random events, and not by a thorough plan. How do we break through the gates of the central media?

Start by printing

Newspapers and magazines will be more interested in gay advertising dollars than television and radio, especially since the cost of print ads is usually lower. But it should be remembered that the press, for the most part, is read only by more educated Americans, many of whom are already inclined to accept homosexuality. Therefore, in order to better spend our dollars, we must skip the readers of New Republic and New Left Review, and focus on such mass publications as Time, People and National Enquirer. 

While we are storming the ramparts with volleys of ink, it is also necessary to warm up the general public with a thin campaign with billboards along the roads. In bold, dark text, a series of non-objectionable messages should be distributed:

IN RUSSIA YOU SAY WHO TO BE. IN AMERICA, WE HAVE THE FREEDOM TO BE MYSELF. . . AND BE THE BEST.

Or

PEOPLE HELP, BUT NOT REFUSAL - THAT'S WHAT AMERICA MEANS.     

And so on. Each poster will appeal to patriotic feelings and drive acceptable statements into the heads of the public - a kind of social advertising serving our purposes. Each poster will be signed in small letters: “Provided by the National Gay Committee” to create positive associations and attract the public to sponsorship.

1 visual stage - to be in sight

To break into television and radio, a more complex plan may be required. Naturally, for starters, we must continue to encourage the emergence of positive gay characters in films and television shows. Daytime talk shows also remain a useful medium for exposure. But to speed up the work, you can try a daring trick to get a review in the media. The intrigue that we have in mind will require careful preparation, but it can save money and increase the visibility and height of gay movement overnight:

Before the next government elections, we can carefully nominate symbolic gay candidates for all high political posts. Our candidates will participate in the pre-election debate, where they will be able to put forward advertising campaigns with a gay theme and demand equal time on the air. Then, just before the election, they can generously leave the race, providing a place for more capable heterosexual applicants. 

At this early stage, it’s essential that you don’t ask people to vote “for” or “against” regarding gay issues, as the majority will vote “against,” and this will mean a huge and visible defeat for our cause.

2 Visual Stage - Hidden Advertising

At that moment, when the gay community has already put its foot in the ajar door, the time has come to offer the channels of gay sponsorship for individual advertisements and television programs. Timing is crucial: an offer must be made immediately after our election rolls go off the screen. If television companies want to look consistent, rather than hypocritical, then they are in our pocket. If they nevertheless try to refuse, then we will make their resistance look manifestly unfounded and possibly illegal. We will only offer “gay ads” created exactly after the ads sponsored by Mormons and others. As usual, viewers will see highly moral messages about the importance of family harmony and understanding, but this time the announcer at the end will say: “This appeal was presented to you by the National Gay Committee”. Everything is very quiet and restrained.

The gay community must join forces with other respected civil liberty groups to promote soft messages about America as a place for everyone, always ending with a direct link to the National Committee or another gay organization. You can also offer sympathetic calls for support and donations to fund AIDS research - if others do, why not?

3 Visual Stage - Transition to Heavy Artillery

After using “salami tactics”, slice after slice, we will get most of the access to the mainstream media, it is time to act openly. Our messages will be directed directly to the deep-rooted attitude of the public towards homosexuals, as to disgusting and opposing strangers. As an example, the following formats can be given for television or radio advertisements designed to eliminate chronic misconceptions.

1 format - for reference: evidence

To make gay men seem less mysterious, you need to imagine a series of short clips with images of a guy or a girl from a neighboring apartment, young and attractive, or warm and sweet grandparents. Sitting at home, they answer questions from an behind-the-scenes interviewer with confidence, complacency and charm. Their comments reveal three social facts:

1. There is someone special in their life with whom they maintain a long relationship (to emphasize the stability of homosexuality, monogamy, devotion);

2. Their families support them and are very important to them (it is emphasized here that gays are not “against families” and that families should not be against gays).

3. As far as they remember themselves, they were always gay and probably born gay. Of course, they never chose their preference (to emphasize that it was natural for them and they did not engage in deliberate confrontation). Interviews should be conducted alone, without the presence of lovers or children, as their involvement will raise worried questions about the complexities of gay social relationships that these commercials cannot explain. Better to take one thing at a time.

2 format - for positive associations: celebrities

While endorsements by celebrity gay figures and sympathetic straight people would be helpful, in America's homophobic climate, such insolence will be unlikely in the near future. Thus, celebrity appearances for the time being will only indicate historical homosexual or bisexual personalities who are famous, respected ... and dead. References may be sardonic and indirect.

3 format - for sympathy for victims: our campaign to end child abuse

As we already said, there are many ways to portray gays as victims of discrimination: images of cruelty, tales of job loss, family breakdown, etc. But we think that 30-second commercials like the following will be most effective:

The camera slowly approaches a middle-class teenager sitting alone in a darkened bedroom. The boy is pleasant and ordinary in appearance, except that he is beaten and looks silently, thoughtfully, with noticeable suffering. As the camera gradually focuses on his face, voice-over comments: this will happen to one out of every ten sons. Growing up, he will understand that he treats things differently than most of his friends. If he opens, he will become an outcast. He will be subjected to bullying, humiliation and assault. If he confides in his parents, they can throw him out into the street. Some will say that he is "against the family." No one will let him be himself. Therefore, he will have to hide. From friends, from family. And it is difficult. Nowadays it is already difficult to be a child, but to be one in ten. . . Message from the National Gay Committee. 

Such advertising is good in that it economically portrays gays as innocent and vulnerable, harassed and misunderstood, surprisingly numerous, but not threatening. She also makes the “anti-family” accusation absurd and hypocritical.

4 format - for identification with victims: changing roles

The general public will be better identified with the plight of gays if straights can, from time to time, stay in their place. Humorous advertising may include the following animated or dramatic script:

The camera zooms in on the heavy oak door of the boss's office, which swings open and the camera (representing you the viewer) enters the room. At a huge table sits a fat and frowning old grouch chewing on a cigar. He looks into the camera (ie at the viewer) and growls, “It's you, Smithers. You're fired!" A younger voice replies in amazement, “But… Mr. Thomberg, I've been with your company for ten years. I thought you were happy with my work. " The boss replies with a note of disgust: “Yes, yes, Smithers, your job is adequate, but I heard rumors that you were seen in town with a girlfriend. Girlfriend! To be honest, I'm shocked. We're not going to hire heterosexuals for this company. Now get out. " A young voice tries to reply, “But boss, this is just not fair! What if it were you? " The boss flashes an angry look, the camera flies out of the room, the heavy door slams shut. The sign on the door reads "Message from the National Gay Committee."

One can easily imagine similar episodes related to housing or other discrimination.

5 format - to denigrate torturers: to hell with spite

We have already pointed out some images that can harm a homophobic vendetta: hateful religious fanatics, neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan will make them look bad and ridiculous (hardly a difficult task). These images should be combined with the images of their gay victims, for propagandists this is called the “brace technique”. For example, for a few seconds you can see a slippery southern preacher with small evil eyes bashing in the pulpit in a frenzy, screaming "about these sick and vile creatures." As his tirade continues, the picture switches to touching photos of gays that look decent, harmless and pretty; And then we switch back to the preacher’s poisonous face. The contrast speaks for itself. The effect is destructive.

6 format - for sponsorship: SOS

During or immediately after these commercials, we must request donations to keep the campaign going. Direct calls from celebrities (preferably alive, thanks) may be helpful here. All appeals must emphasize that money can be provided anonymously and that all donations are confidential. “We cannot help if you do not help,” and all that.

The time has come

We have outlined here a plan to transform the social values ​​of heterosexual America through a media campaign. There are one hundred reasons why a campaign cannot be done or why it will be risky. But there are at least 20 million good reasons why such a program should be tested in the coming years: this is the well-being and happiness of every homosexual in this country. As the last major legitimately oppressed minority in American society, it is time for gay men to take effective measures to reunite with the mainstream in pride and strength. We believe that such a campaign, whether you like it or not, is the only way to do this in the near future. And, again: time may end. The AIDS epidemic causes anger and fear in the heart of heterosexual America. As the virus seeps from homosexual circles into the rest of society, we should not have any illusions about who is to blame. The next forty years can be decided by the following forty: will gay men claim their freedom and equality, or will they retreat again, like the American caste of hated untouchables. It is more than a pun: speak now or be silent forever.    

Translation of the Science for Truth group

The end of the fragment "After The Ball»

This was written at the end of the 80's, when the propaganda campaign in the media was just beginning, but nowadays, having achieved significant success in the legal and social sphere, homosexuals no longer need to pretend, and they can afford to be themselves. The ball is finished, the masks are removed, makeup and makeup are washed off.

As the authors of the LGBT propaganda methodology themselves say: “Let the camel first stick its nose into the tent, and only then its unsightly backside. ”

What we are seeing now in the west is this unsightly ass. But once and there it all began with decent processions with colored flags and posters calling for "justice", "freedom" and "rights".

Here we cannot but recall the lines from Exupery's Citadel:

“The crowd calls freedom to rot freedom and justice - their rot ...
The rabble screamed, defending his right to rot. Created by decay, he fought for it. Spawn cockroaches, and the cockroaches will have rights. Rights obvious to everyone. Singers will chase them. They will come to you and sing about the great tribulation of cockroaches, doomed to death. "

Problems of the “gay” community through the eyes of insiders