At the instigation of RBC , Fontanka, and other media outlets that don't represent the opinions of the majority of Russians, calls for the introduction of "sex education" in Russia have spread like wildfire. One Facebook group (banned in Russia) even conducted a survey, according to which "75% of Russians supported the idea of introducing sex education classes in schools." Remarkably, only three-quarters of these "Russians" had children. We hope the organizers of this survey and the voters will examine the facts presented here and be able to balance their views.
The propaganda for the need for "sex education" comes from the same people lobbying for the "Domestic Violence" law, modeled on the " Istanbul Convention ," which countries are abandoning when they're concerned about their sovereignty and demographic security. Apparently, another bill or public campaign is being prepared to promote depopulation projects in Russia. It will be interesting to see who comes forward with these initiatives now.
They usually become active around December 1st, when, under the false threat of spreading HIV among children, they engage in sexual abuse under the guise of sex education lessons, despite the fact that the main way children are infected is vertical transmission from mother to child, as reported by the Ministry of Health.
In 2020, even Rospotrebnadzor, represented by Vadim Pokrovsky, head of the department at the Rospotrebnadzor Research Institute of Epidemiology, joined the "sex education" propaganda.
Maria Vladimirovna Markova, at the right time, proposed a bill proposing " the need to establish a ban on the dissemination of information calling for refusal of medical examination for the detection of HIV infection and/or treatment of HIV infection (AIDS) and penalties for its dissemination ." It would seem a useful initiative, but after wandering through the depths of the law, the text takes an unexpected turn: " The dissemination of information containing calls for refusal of medical examination, diagnosis, prevention , and/or treatment of HIV infection is prohibited ."
As you can imagine, with this formulation, sexual "education" lessons and other child abuse activities become mandatory , as in the West, and punishment is provided for parents who attempt to protect their children from abuse.
We will consider the reasons for the introduction of sex education, recommended by the UN and WHO, its “effectiveness” and consequences, which, to put it mildly, are not encouraging.
"Effectiveness" of school sex education programs
Commissioned by CDC in 2017 meta-analysis studies that allegedly proved the effectiveness of "sex-education" programs revealed that they were of low methodological quality and had conflicting results, which did not allow making unambiguous conclusions.
Reviewdone a year later did not find no evidence that school sex education programs are effective in reducing teenage pregnancies and preventing HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
Another meta-analysis, " Do School-Based Curriculums Prevent HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections in Adolescents, " reached similar conclusions: "The studies, including randomized controlled trials, were of low methodological quality and had mixed findings, failing to provide a convincing justification for the effectiveness of school-based programs." The most effective program was not a sex education program, but a six-year program based on social development.
Since 2010, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has sponsored numerous studies testing the effectiveness of teen pregnancy prevention programs on risky sexual behavior among young people. A meta-analysis of these studies, conducted between 2015 and 2019 and submitted to HHS, found no significant support for the overall effectiveness of this group of pregnancy prevention programs. The direction of effects was mixed, and none reached statistical significance.
In 2019, researchers from the Institute for Research and Evaluation (IRE) published a global review examining scientific publications examining two different approaches to sexuality education: comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) and abstinence-only sexuality education (AE).
The results they obtained confirm the previous data. Of the 103 studies studied, only 3 showed any positive effect. 16 studies have identified the harmful effects of Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE). Others showed that such lessons in schools are useless. Of 17 studies on the formation of abstinence (AE), 7 have shown sustained effects, and one has shown the harmfulness of such training. That is, most of the work demonstrates the uselessness of the intervention of the school and the state in the sexual development of the child.
As the authors of this review write, " When assessed against reliable criteria, a database containing 103 of the strongest and most recent CSE studies, quality-checked by three prominent scientific institutions (UNESCO, CDC, and HHS), found little evidence of the effectiveness of CSE in school settings and relatively many negative consequences. Where there was some positive evidence, almost all of it was generated by program developers and has not been replicated. Three decades of research demonstrate that comprehensive sexuality education is not an effective public health strategy in classrooms worldwide, and that these programs may cause harm ."
Such teaching leads to increased sexual experimentation among students, an increased number of sexual partners and overall sexual activity, and a decline in sexual health. In other words, teaching about sex only fuels interest and does nothing to achieve its intended purpose. Quite the contrary, as confirmed by British statistics on teenage pregnancies in 1999–2010.
Even in a country as far away as Ghana, they're considering ways to delay adolescent sexual debut: "The results show that early sexual debut increases the number of lifetime sexual partners. Delaying first sexual intercourse reduces the number of lifetime sexual partners. The study recommends prioritizing policies aimed at delaying sexual debut to reduce adolescents' exposure to multiple sexual partners . "
A study of Canadian youth showed that young mothers reported higher consumption of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol during pregnancy. It would be natural to address drug and alcohol abuse prevention in order to prevent unsafe sexual behavior and violence, but Stanislav Belkovsky's program of liberal reforms for Russia lacks such a provision. Instead, he proposed: 1) the abolition of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2) the legalization of same-sex marriage, and 3) the legalization of mild stimulants.
Think how you can characterize the activities of people trying to impose a non-working and dangerous technique on our children? Sabotage? Genocide? Causing grievous bodily harm? After all, even harmless vitamins, before they get to children, undergo comprehensive research, and are given only with a positive result.
Recommendations for comprehensive sexuality education WHO
It should be noted that the authors of the article are not opposed to sex education in principle. We are opposed to sexual perversion, which is being imposed on the entire world through the UN under the guise of sex education. Indeed, it is being imposed . For example, when Nigeria refused to implement radical CSE programs promoting promiscuity and homosexuality, Western countries threatened to cut off foreign aid.
The UN specialized agency The World Health Organization (WHO) is funded, among other things, by large implementers of depopulation projects. WHO has repeatedly shown incompetence and biased decisions, for example, agreement about the depathologization of homosexuality and transsexuality and excluding them from the list of mental disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).
The UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) is a body of independent experts monitoring the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women by state parties . The implementation of this treaty, like many other UN documents, has been reduced to the destruction of the traditional family and "sex education." In addition to recommending that Western NGOs be allowed to operate without registering as foreign agents, the committee urges the implementation of a comprehensive strategy that includes consistent, far-reaching measures aimed at women and men at all levels of society, including religious leaders, to eradicate stereotypes and patriarchal notions about the roles and responsibilities of women and men in the family and society. It recommends the inclusion of a comprehensive, gender-sensitive, and age-appropriate course of study on sexual and reproductive health and rights for girls and boys in the mandatory curricula of primary and secondary schools, and the legalization of prostitution, while simultaneously repealing measures preventing abortion.
Russia reports to the UN that: “The inclusion of a comprehensive course on sexual and reproductive health, taking into account gender issues and age-appropriate, in the mandatory curriculum of primary and secondary schools falls within the competence of the educational authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation .”
To better understand the seriousness of such recommendations, let's look at the information that should be provided to children according to the WHO Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe :
Age group 0–4 : Experience of joy and pleasure from touching one's own body, masturbation at an early age. Various types of mutual and family relationships. The right to explore gender identities.
Age group 4–6 : The meaning and expression of sexuality, sexual sensations. All sensations are normal. Same-sex relationships. A positive attitude toward diversity. Respect for different norms related to sexuality.
Age group 6–9 : The positive impact of sexuality on health and well-being. Children's sexual rights. Masturbation/self-stimulation. Sex in the media (including the Internet). Sexual intercourse. Choices regarding motherhood and pregnancy, infertility, adoption. Birth control through contraception.
Age group 9–12 : Differences in sexual behavior. Positive attitudes, respect, and understanding of the diversity of sexuality and sexual orientations. First sexual experience. Pleasure, masturbation, orgasm. Free choice of partner. Gender orientation. Differences between gender identity and biological sex. Making a conscious decision to have sexual experience or not. Sexual rights, as defined by the IPPF and the EAC.
Age group 12–15 : Gender identity and sexual orientation, including self-expression/homosexuality. Understanding sexuality as a cognitive process. Developing negotiation skills for safe and enjoyable sex. Recognizing the symptoms of STIs.
Age group 15 : Expressing one's true self to others (acknowledging homosexual or bisexual feelings). Acceptance of different sexual orientations and sexual identities. Feeling empowered to assert sexual rights. Business sex (prostitution, but also sex for small gifts, visiting restaurants/nightlife venues, small amounts of money). Pregnancy (also in same-sex couples) and infertility, abortion, contraception, emergency contraception.
Here's what the comprehensive sex education program "Teen Talk" looks like , offered by Planned Parenthood, which we'll come back to later. We were forced to censor some of the materials intended for children due to their pornographic nature.
Scientific publications on sex education methods recommend the following:
To help students develop a critical approach to sex / gender norms, sex education teachers should pay attention to male anal pleasure. Male anal receptivity erodes conventional binary systems such as male / female, male / female, natural / queer. With the suppression of male receptivity, the taboo on male anal pleasure helps legitimize the hegemonic sexual / gender beliefs, as well as the sexism, homophobia, and male dominance they encourage. On the other hand, by deconstructing the male anal taboo and creating a new language of anal pleasure, “prostage,” educators can help students challenge restrictive gender norms.
Implications of the introduction of WHO methodologies
There is an increase in the incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis in the United States (US) and European countries.
US data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) demonstrates a sharp and sustained increase in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in recent years. STD rates have increased for the fifth consecutive year and have reached record highs. Cases of congenital syphilis (transmitted from mother to child during pregnancy) increased by 40% from 2017 to 2018. Congenital syphilis can lead to miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, and serious lifelong physical and neurological problems.
A similar picture is observed in England:
Despite this, the government has made "LGBT*-inclusive relationships" and sex education mandatory for UK schools starting in September. The Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) plans to crack down on schools that refuse to teach LGBT*-inclusive courses. For example, the Department for Education warned the headmaster of an Orthodox Jewish school, who believes that discussions of "intimate relationships, sexual orientation, and gender transition should be left to parents," that he has two weeks to introduce an LGBT*-inclusive curriculum or close the school. Previously, a teacher at Gloucestershire Academy was fired for "gross misconduct" after urging her Facebook friends to sign a petition against the program, which openly promotes same-sex relationships and gender transition for children as young as four.
In Europe, the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is steadily increasing . Having bisexual or homosexual contacts increases the risk of contracting gonorrhea by 3,3 times and syphilis by 13,7 times, according to Belgian statistics.
In the Netherlands, syphilis diagnoses increased by 30% in 2016 compared to 2015. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in diagnoses among men who have sex with men (MSM), both with and without HIV. STD testing at the Center for Sexual Health (CSG) in 2019 showed an increase in the percentage of STD cases compared to 2018. Syphilis diagnoses increased by 16,8%, and gonorrhea by 11%, primarily among men who have sex with men (MSM).
Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted infection in Finland . In 2019, nearly 16,200 cases of chlamydia were diagnosed, 1000 more than in 2018. This is the highest annual figure ever recorded in the National Register of Infectious Diseases. Infections are spreading primarily among young people: almost 80% of those diagnosed were aged 15–29. The incidence of gonorrhea and syphilis has also increased.
In Germany, between 2010 and 2017, the incidence of syphilis increased by 83% to 9,1 cases per 100,000 inhabitants.
In Canada, the national rate of infectious syphilis increased from 5,1 per 100,000 population in 2011 to 24,7 per 100,000 population in 2020 (an increase of over 400%). The highest increases occurred in 2018 and 2019 (50% and 45% per year, respectively), corresponding to the highest number of cases in the past 10 years. Rates in men have been consistently higher than in women over the past 10 years; however, from 2016 to 2020, rates among women increased by 773% compared to 73% among men.
Many countries are seeing a decrease in testing due to COVID-19, which does not determine long-term trends.
And according to UK government data , between 2014 and 2018 there was a significant increase in diagnoses of chlamydia in MSM (61%: from 11,760 to 18,892), syphilis (61%: from 3527 to 5681) and gonorrhoea (43%: from 18,568 to 26,574).
Australian scientists write about the "rampant incidence of gonorrhea among bi- and homosexuals."
Among people with same-sex preferences, risky behavior and infections are on the rise. Condom use is declining, and scientists predict a further decline.
Moreover, the number of people with homosexual preferences is growing among young people, and the number of people suffering from “ gender dysphoria ” is increasing like an epidemic, while the proportional increase in infections characteristic of MSM does not allow us to explain the increase in the LGBT* population solely by the increased openness of respondents.
According to Yougov : "In 2019, the percentage of 'absolutely heterosexual' people among British 18-24-year-olds was almost half that of older adults (44% compared to 81%). While in a similar 2015 survey, only 2% of young people identified as 'bisexual,' four years later, that number had increased eightfold, to 16%."
After the lessons of "sex enlightenment" children are imbued with the fatal delusion that you only need to use a condom, and then you can change as many sexual partners as you want.
In fact, from unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, a condom is at best a partial protection, and from some viruses and bacteria on the surface of the skin (like papillomaviruses and some forms of syphilis) it is useless at all. No condom manufacturer would dare to claim that its "product # 2" gives the customer 100% protection. Thus, the use of a condom only reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of infection, and therefore, instead of the deceptive advertising slogan "safer sex", the expression "safer sex" has long been used.
Studies have shown that the effectiveness of a condom, when used correctly, averages 81% (according to various estimates, from 69% to 94%). Moreover, infectious diseases are easily transmitted through a kiss, when it comes to a deep, long kiss, and a person has manifestations of the disease in the mouth. For example, with syphilis, chancre and other rashes often appear in the mouth. Gonorrheal and chlamydial pharyngitis can also be transmitted through kissing, as can condylomas (HPV). I must say that cases of infection with sexually transmitted infections through a kiss are relatively rare, but the likelihood of contracting herpes is very high.
According to statistics, women who have had 10 or more sexual partners are more susceptible to cancer, including breast, cervical and rectal cancer. The statistics also apply to men with characteristic cancers. The reason is human papillomaviruses (HPV), transmitted through sexual contact. It has been proven that HPV contributes to the development of cervical cancer in women and, apparently, breast cancer. One of the clinical manifestations of HPV is the so-called venereal warts. The papilloma virus can be transmitted to a child during childbirth and affect the bronchi and trachea.
The more sexual partners a person has, the higher the risk of contracting various viral and bacterial infections, many of which result in either defective offspring or complete infertility. For example, every second woman who has had ascending gonorrhea suffers from infertility. Furthermore, promiscuous sexual relations and perverted practices can result in immunological infertility in both sexes. Contact with heterogeneous sperm samples, as well as its entry into the gastrointestinal tract, leads to the production of antisperm antibodies (ASA) by the immune system, which prevent conception, gestation, and birth of a healthy child. 40–45% of prostitutes and 68% of women with multiple partners are positive for ASA, which is the cause of autoimmune infertility. Thus, the decline of morality leads to the genetic degeneration of the population.
A huge number of causes of reproductive disorders in men are known, among which the leading position is occupied by infection of the urogenital tract.
In a study of couples with miscarriage, various ejaculate pathologies (pathospermia) were detected in 89% of the men examined. A decrease in the concentration of active sperm and their motility (asthenozoospermia) and an imbalance of the acid-base balance of the ejaculate (pH 7,9-8,0) were found in 100% of cases. Antisperm antibodies (92%), increased viscosity of the ejaculate (63%), the presence of mucus and microflora (44%), and teratozoospermia (defectiveness of most sperm) (35%) were also diagnosed. Human papillomavirus infection was diagnosed in 61% of patients, and herpesvirus infection in 40%. Chlamydia infection was detected in 45%, vaginal trichomonas in 5%, ureaplasma in 86%, and mycoplasma M. hominis in 44%. All examined individuals (100%) were found to have two or more infectious agents.
Results of Sex Education
The results of such "education", and in fact, corruption, were announced on November 22, 2019 during a round table "Legal protection of traditional values", held in the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. Director of the Institute for Family Research (USA) Paul Cameron said that propaganda of perversion in the United States has doubled the number of homosexuals among high school students over the past decade.
Promoting promiscuous sex and perversion, he described as the most "dogmatic, dictatorial and fascist religion that ever existed," has led to a shift in the sexual preferences of American high school students, he said. In 2001-2009, 92,1% of high school students in the United States answered that they are interested only in members of the opposite sex. Only 5% of the respondents identified themselves as bi- and homosexuals. At the same time, 2,6% of high school students unsubscribed as “undecided”.
In 2017, the number of heterosexual high school students fell to 85,1%. At the same time, the number of homosexuals and bisexuals among the high school students surveyed increased to 10,3%. In 2017, the number of transsexuals for the first time became any significant number and amounted to 1,8%. The number of undecided high school students was 1,6%.
According to the scientist, the increase in the number of schoolchildren who identify themselves as representatives of the LGBT* community is the result of school education, which instills that sexuality and gender choice are a child’s personal matter [8].
Already in the West, absolutely heterosexual youth is a sexual minority [7], and the number of homosexuals is growing to levels incompatible with population replenishment. According to WHO standards, 15% of infertile couples represent a demographic problem for a country. Today in the Western world, to the 15% of infertile due to organic causes, up to 14% of the younger generation consider themselves LGBT* are added
There is no doubt that such changes are taking place through a carefully thought out and controlled process. Consider who can benefit from it.
The goals of sex education
A study conducted by the University of Akron found that sex education makes students more tolerant and less hostile to sexual deviance.
Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) Director Sergei Naryshkin made a number of important statements at an international security meeting in Ufa. He is convinced that, under the guise of "emancipating people," the forces of the new world order are waging a deliberate war against traditional values and national identity. Young people are being particularly targeted.
"In order to accelerate the erosion of the concept of gender, the value of family and marriage, programs are being implemented to promote the "rights" of the LGBT* community, to spread the ideas of radical feminism... In essence, the goal is to make people disunited, individuals suffering from neurotic disorders with a constantly altered state of consciousness. It is clear that such individuals are an ideal object for manipulation, especially if they have an iPhone connected to the network in their hands."
As Krylatova T.A. writes :
“When we hear words about the need to reduce the birth rate on the planet, for example from Club of Rome, Princes Harry and William, for some reason we believe that these are only theoretical discussions and abstract wishes of the elites and demographers. But recently, reports and materials have begun to appear that say the opposite: back in the sixties, American demographers formulated and published methods for reducing the birth rate, which became a priority of US foreign policy. The famous Kissinger report "NSSM-200", compiled by the National Security Council and insisting on the urgent need to reduce the birth rate on a global scale, in 1975 became a guide to action by order of President Ford, and in 2011, "protection of LGBT* rights" also became a priority of American foreign policy."
Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, two Harvard gay activists who developed homosexual propaganda tactics, inAfter the Ball»Noted characteristic of the gay movement «political fascism и oppression of political correctness "... This fascism acquires a particular danger when it is used by the global elites to reduce the birth rate, which has been repeatedly stated, including in scientific publications. [2].
Depopulation
In 1954, a pamphlet "Population Bomb" was published in the USA, which inflated the threat of high population growth rates and declared the urgent need for birth control.
In 1958, Sir Arthur Charles Clarke, in his futurological forecast , speaking about the overpopulation of the planet, touched upon various methods of depopulation - from infanticide, sterilization and imprisonment after the second child, to forced homosexuality:
"The time may yet come when homosexuality becomes practically obligatory, not merely fashionable. Indeed, it will be a piquant paradox if, in the long run—and let us take the survival of humanity as a whole as our criterion—this controversial instinct turns out to be more valuable for survival than the urge to reproduce" ( Harper's Magazine, Vol. 216, January 1958 ).
In 1959, the US State Department issued a report on world population trends, which concluded that its rapid growth threatened international stability [2].
In his 1969 State of the Union address, US President Nixon called population growth "one of the gravest challenges to the destiny of mankind" and called for urgent action [3] . Demographer Kingsley Davis (one of the central figures in the development of birth control policy), along with the popularization of contraceptives, abortion, and sterilization, proposed "changing sexual mores" and encouraging "unnatural forms of sexual intercourse" [2] . Davis's partner, sociologist Judith Blake, proposed eliminating tax and housing incentives that encourage childbearing and eliminating legal and social sanctions against homosexuality [4] . Preston Cloud, representing the US National Academy of Sciences, recommended that the government legalize abortion and same-sex unions [2] . That same year, the vice-president of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Frederick Jaffe, issued a memorandum in which “encouraging the growth of homosexuality” was listed as one of the methods of reducing the birth rate [5].
Three months later, the Stonewall riots erupted and pressure began on the American Psychiatric Organization (APA), which culminated in an administrative decision to exclude homosexuality from the classification of disorders. No convincing evidence has been presented to justify such a change in psychiatry's attitude towards homosexuality.
Well-known activist in the US homosexual movement, Barbara Gittings, frankly admitted: " ...It was never a medical decision, and that's why it all happened so quickly. After all, only three years passed from the first shocking action at the APA conference until the board of directors voted to remove homosexuality from the list of mental disorders. It was a political decision (...) We were healed overnight with the stroke of a pen... " [2].
In 1970, the author of the demographic transition theory, Frank Notestein, speaking to senior officers at the National War College, noted that “homosexuality is defended on the grounds that it helps reduce population growth” [4].
Further events follow the obvious direction:
1972 year - report "Growth limits”Presented 12 possible scenarios for the development of mankind. All favorable scenarios required political and social changes, including tight birth control at the rate of natural decline.
1974 - The National Security Council's NSSM-200 report states the urgent need for a global reduction in birth rates and suggests "concentration on educating and indoctrinating the younger generation regarding the desirability of smaller family size."
At the UN World Population Conference in Bucharest, all member states (except the Vatican) are committed to reducing fertility.
1975 year - by order of President Ford "NSSM-200" becomes a guide to action in the field of US foreign policy.
1990 – the exclusion of homosexuality from the WHO ICD and the beginning of an information campaign to normalize homosexuality.
1994 – The Cairo Accords, which discussed human reproduction, family structure, and sexuality. The primary objective was to reduce the birth rate, which was presented in the altruistic guise of gender equality, concern for women's reproductive health, and respect for their reproductive rights (i.e., abortion and sterilization). Specific depopulation measures listed included "sex education," contraception, and anti-fertility propaganda.
2000 - from UN documents: “WHO, as well as UNFPA and UNAIDS, fully support the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) Charter on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and call on ministries of health to: Respect sexual and reproductive rights and, where necessary, review relevant laws, particularly regarding abortion and homosexuality ” [9].
UNFPA is the United Nations body for “population” and “demographic issues”, which includes population growth. That is, the organization, created to combat population growth, directly links the successful solution of the tasks assigned to it with the promotion of abortion and homosexuality. And this organization is in full solidarity with the IPPF, whose vice-president in 1969 introduced a memorandum with various methods of birth control, most of which have become reality:
2010 - WHO standards for sexuality education in Europe with propaganda of homosexuality with the aim of early sexualization of children [10].
2011 – The Barack Obama administration declares “the fight for the rights of sexual minorities” a priority of American foreign policy.
2015 – The US Supreme Court forces all states to legalize same-sex marriage.
2017 – The Club of Rome report "Come On! Capitalism, Short-Termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet" states: "On a finite planet, population growth must be curtailed before nature forces it."
2019 - On September 10, 2019, the Project Syndicate website published the manifesto "The World and the UN Must Reduce Population Growth."
In 2020 , former US Ambassador to Germany and openly gay Richard Grenell, the acting US Director of National Intelligence, stated that the agencies under his jurisdiction should be involved in pressuring countries to repeal laws and policies criminalizing homosexuality. Similarly, decriminalization of homosexuality was one of the provisions in the Kosovo agreement imposed on Serbia by the Americans.
Promotion of homosexuality and transsexuality
Doctor of Medical Sciences and Professor Kocharyan Garnik Surenovich said in a report for the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation:
In the modern world, changes are underway aimed at eroding traditional norms and values, which, in particular, is reflected in medical classifications. It is a mistake to believe that homosexuality is always innate and therefore no external influences can influence the direction of sexual desire. Moreover, it can be argued that it is never innate, as any direction of sexual desire in a newborn child is absent and develops only years later. Modern research indicates that in some cases, only a mild predisposing influence of prenatal biological factors can be considered, while psychological and social factors play a major role in the development of homosexuality. Therefore, the negative role of the promotion of homosexual relations is obvious, as it can lead to a change in the direction of sexual desire or to its incorrect formation. This understanding has led to the introduction of laws in a number of countries banning the promotion of homosexuality. Thus, in eight US states (Alabama, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Utah), following Russia, a ban was imposed on such propaganda” [11].
The promotion of homosexuality or a homosexual lifestyle is just as possible as the promotion of a healthy lifestyle. There are scientifically proven methods for the promotion of homosexuality, recognized as the "ABCs of gay activism" [1,12,13] . Thanks to the promotion of homosexuality, the number of young people declaring their non-heterosexuality is increasing [7] , while the proportional increase in diseases characteristic of homosexuals [14,15] does not allow us to explain the statistical increase in the LGBT* population solely by the increased openness of respondents [14] . The promotion of homosexuality and perverted forms of sexual contacts has been proposed by American specialists to reduce the birth rate [2].
American scientists from Brown University investigated the reasons for the surge in “sudden gender dysphoria” among young people and came to the conclusion that the key factor in changing a teenager’s gender identity is his immersion in transgender-themed content on the Internet [21].
Before declaring themselves transgender, teenagers watched videos about the so-called "transition", communicated with transgender people on social networks and read transgender resources. Many were also friends with one or more transgender people. A third of the respondents reported that if there was at least one transgender teenager in their circle of communication, then more than half of the teenagers in this group also began to identify themselves as transgender. A group in which 50% of its members become transgender represents a rate 70 times higher than expected prevalence among young people.
Sovereignty and demographic security
Russia, following the West, is facing unprecedented social changes aimed at reducing the birth rate, including the methods of indoctrination of anti-fertile and anti-family behavior among young people. For this, the private political and ideological interests of the so-called. "Minorities" are matched by "universal human rights".
Any revolution requires people who are not connected to the society in which such a revolution is being prepared, both to form an elite and to create a cheap and united opposition. The LGBT* movement is characterized by cosmopolitanism, anti-social and anti-state sentiments. Most of its adherents consider themselves members of the LGBT* community and citizens of the LGBT* world rather than members of society and citizens of the country.
Apparently, the "brave new world" will come to us on the shoulders of sexual perverts, used as an instrument of geopolitical influence. Almost all EU leaders are childless, and now they are joined by open representatives of LGBT*, who have increased rates mental and other problems inherent in this community. Homosexual authors of the book "After The Ball", Addressing the problems of behavior of the average" gay ", claimthat homosexuals reject all forms of morality; that they have sex in public places, and if disturbed, they start screaming about oppression and homophobia; that they are narcissistic, dissolute, selfish, prone to lies, hedonism, infidelity, cruelty, self-destruction, denial of reality, irrationality, political fascism and delusional ideas. It is interesting to note that 40 years earlier these qualities were practically one to one described by a famous psychiatrist. Edmund Bergler, who studied homosexuality for 30 years and was recognized as the "most important theorist" in this field. Declassified The CIA document describes the character of homosexuals as follows: “It has long been believed that homosexuality not only presents a vulnerability to blackmail, and therefore a significant security risk, but also indicates a degree of character defect (i.e. unsuitability) that is statistically incompatible with the likelihood of successful completion. career in the Agency ".
How do you like this elite and opposition?
In addition, due to the political considerations of activists, the rights of ordinary “LGBT*” are violated, in particular, the receipt of reliable information about homosexuality and psychotherapeutic assistance for those who want to change the unnatural direction of their sexual desire.
Even the Europeans, realizing the destructiveness of the methods of reducing the birth rate proposed by the US demographers, are taking steps towards preserving the country's sovereignty and demographic security.
So, the government of Viktor Orban decided to do what is good for the Hungarians, and not for the globalists, taking the side of common sense more and more boldly. Unlike his European counterparts, the Hungarian leader is open about the benefits of heterosexual marriage and is pursuing an active policy to preserve traditional family values and increase the birth rate. He refused to participate "in the tasteless homosexual Eurovision flotilla with its egregious transvestites and bearded women." He closed the country to migrant flows, limited the activities of NGOs and expelled the Central European University founded by Soros (an analogue of our HSE) from the country, stopping the obscurantism of “gender studies”.
In May 2020, Hungarian legislators approved a law, the main point of which proposes to adopt "biological sex based on primary sex characteristics and chromosomes as the only justification for considering a person a man or a woman." The passage of the law will end the legal recognition of “transgender people” who want to pretend to be of the opposite sex.
The President of Poland signed a document called the “Family Card,” which includes guarantees of benefits for families with children and protection of families from LGBT* ideology.
Duda emphasized that adoption of children by same-sex couples is a foreign ideology, alien to Polish traditional values. Therefore, the Family Card states that the state is obliged to protect the family from LGBT* interference, and only parents and no one else will be responsible for the sex education of their children. The document also states that LGBT* ideology is prohibited in state institutions.
The leaders of the countries rejecting the Istanbul Convention (Poland, Hungary, Turkey) say that they seek to protect their own cultural and national identity, family values, and hinder anti-family tendencies and anti-family policies.
In January 2020 V.V. Putin in his address to the Federal Assembly said:
“The fate of Russia, its historical perspective depends on how many of us there will be (I want to start the substantive part with demography), depends on how many children will be born in Russian families in a year, in five, ten years, what they will grow up, what they will become, what will they do for the development of the country, and what values will support them in life ...
It is our historic responsibility to meet this challenge. Not only to get out of the demographic trap, but also to ensure sustainable natural growth of the country's population by the middle of the coming decade. In 2024, the birth rate should be 1,7 ".
It is impossible to solve the tasks of sustainable population growth set by the President if Russia continues to apply technologies for reducing the birth rate developed by Western demographers, which consist in encouraging homosexuality, transsexualism, childlessness, abortion, sexual behavior that contributes to disease and sterility, and other methods of destroying the institution of the family.
The fight against traditional ideas, which they call “homophobia,” is studied by HSE researchers as a method of overcoming government support and collective Russian identity [6].
Sex education
Russian sexologists, however, offer sound approaches to sex education . Sexologist, sexologist, psychotherapist, and family psychologist Evgeny Aleksandrovich Kulgavchuk, President of the Professional Association of Sexologists and a full member of the Professional Psychotherapeutic League, says :
“Of course, a five-year-old child does not need to paint the entire anatomy in a medical way, and it is completely unnecessary, for example, to tell and show the girl where the clitoris is. If we are talking about secondary school, when a child is already undergoing biology and can, within the school course, operate with concepts at the level of pistils and stamens, in this case it may already be appropriate to speak in medical terms as well. Therefore, already in middle school age, it is quite possible to tell the child in general terms about the names, nevertheless without going into details. For example, it is enough for a boy to understand that there is a penis and testicles. And what is important not to wear tight underwear, so that there are no problems with sperm maturation and reproduction in the future, that you need to monitor the hygiene of the penis, and that this is just as important as brushing your teeth (in the event that parents missed hygiene issues at an earlier age). And it is completely unnecessary to tell him about the spermatic cords. Of course, synonymous words can also be cited. For example, the male genital organ, also known as the penis, also known as the penis. Of course, it is better to entrust this conversation with the boy to the dad than to the mom and vice versa, and the mother, of course, and not the dad, should talk about washing away with her daughter. "
To the question: " How appropriate is it to discuss intimate matters with children within the confines of a school (public place) rather than in a relaxed atmosphere at home? " the specialist replies: "I'm inclined to believe that a home setting can be more sensitive and effective. In some families, this can be a good start for a confidential conversation between parents and children, preferably with a member of the same sex, of course . "
RosSian children even without "seksprosvet" receive enough information about the structure of the reproductive system in biology lessons, and they get acquainted with STDs in full and necessary volume at lessons LIFE SAFETY FUNDAMENTALS.
Literature
1. Kirk M., Madsen H. After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Doubleday, 1989 p. ISBN 398.
2. Lysov, V. G. Information and analytical report. “The rhetoric of the homosexual movement in light of scientific facts.” Research and Innovation Center, 2019. – 751 p. – doi:10.12731/978-5-907208-04-9, ISBN 978-5-907208-04-9. Online https://pro-lgbt.ru/5155/
3. Richard Nixon, Special Message to the Congress on Problems of Population Growth. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/239625
4. Connelly M., Population Control is History: New Perspectives on the International Campaign to Limit Population Growth (Eng.), Comparative Studies in Society and History., 2003, Vol. 45, iss. 1., P. 122-147., ISSN 0010-4175 1475-2999, 0010-4175., DOI: 10.1017 / S0010417503000069.
5. Jaffe F. Letter to Bernard Berelson (memorandum). Available online https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0KCqtNShmxgYTA1REcxai1OME0.
6. Gulevich O., Osin E., et al., Scrutinizing homophobia: A model of perception of homosexuals in Russia, Journal of Homosexuality. 2018. Vol. 65. No. 13.P. 1838-1866., DOI: 10.1080 / 00918369.2017.1391017.
8. https://daliaresearch.com/blog/counting-the-lgbt-population-6-of-europeans-identify-as-lgbt/
9. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/120226/E71193.pdf
10. Standards of Sexuality Education in Europe. A document for policy-makers, managers, and specialists in education and health care, FCSP, Cologne, 2010, 76 p., ISBN 978-3-937707-82-2 https://www.bzga-whocc.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente/WHO_BZgA_Standards_russisch.pdf
11. https://regnum.ru/news/society/2803617.html
12. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-10-04-vw-693-story.html : “As the authors readily admit: “We're talking about propaganda.””.
13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsggp7LEiRk LGBT* activist, co-founder and head of the “Russian LGBT* Network” Igor Kochetkov (a person performing the functions of a foreign agent) (according to Wikipedia, “a candidate of historical sciences, a Nobel Prize nominee and one of the 100 global thinkers of our time”) in his lecture: “The political power of the global LGBT* movement: how activists achieved their goals” said that this book (After The Ball) became the “ABC” of LGBT* activists around the world, including in Russia. Everyone followed, and many still follow, the principles proposed in it.”
14. Catherine H. Mercer, Kevin A. Fenton, Andrew J. Copas, Kaye Wellings, Bob Erens. Increasing prevalence of male homosexual partnerships and practices in Britain 1990-2000: evidence from national probability surveys // AIDS (London, England). - 2004-07-02. - T. 18, no. 10. - P. 1453-1458.
15. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexually-transmitted-infections-stis-annual-data-tables . In England, between 2014 and 2018, there was a significant increase in the number of diagnoses of chlamydia (61%; from 11,760 to 18,892), syphilis (61%; from 3527 to 5681) and gonorrhoea (43%; from 18,568 to 26,574) in MSM.
16.: Kocharyan G. S. On conversion therapy and the feasibility of its use // The World of Sexology (electronic journal). - 2020. - No. 18. - URL: http://1sexology.ru/kocharyan-gso-konversionnoj-terapii-i-celesoobraznosti-eyo-primeneniya/
17. Marseille E, Mirzazadeh A, Biggs MA, et al. Effectiveness of School-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs in the USA: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prev Sci. 2018; 19 (4): 468. doi: 10.1007 / s11121-017-0861-6
18. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2018/press-release-2018-std-prevention-conference.html
19. Kocharyan GS The role of genetic factors in the formation of homosexuality: a modern analysis of the problem // Men's health. - 2018. - No. 4 (67). - S. 20-25.
20. http://www.doctors-sexologists.ru/publik/230-krylatova.html
21. Lisa Littman. Rapid-onset gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults: A study of parental reports. PLOS ONE, 2018; 13 (8): e0202330 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202330 More details: https://pro-lgbt.ru/550/
Group "Science for Truth":
much text
it is impossible to promote homosexuality and pederasty in schools or anywhere else. glasses for the family and themselves propagandize debauchery .. I'm sure that Western partners themselves have state sex. they impose on us from the west this is the program of the antichrist and his system of values .. this must not be allowed
You forgot to mention the problems associated with the fact that there is no sex education. First, children are afraid to talk about their problems with their parents, and parents, in turn, do not know how to talk to children, because their parents from the USSR did not tell them fucking themselves. Do you know how many girls 11-15 years old I have who were subjected to violence, bullying and other untidy situations and were silent about it. As a result, we have an early pregnancy, psychological problems that we do not recognize, and STDs.
Promoting LGBT people in children? Can you hear what you are saying yourself?
Sexuality education from the age of 5 is a conversation about personal boundaries, boundaries of what is permissible, about “good” and “bad” secrets that must be told without fail to parents, and not the corruption of children. Sex in schools in Europe starts to stutter only from the fifth grade ... Study the information before writing this article
Sexuality education is NECESSARY for children, it allows them not to be afraid to openly talk to their parents about their problems (note, problems not only related to the genitals, but all sorts of problems).
It seems that the article was written by a perverted and offended person who reduces all topics to sex, because sex education is not only about sex, but about everyone's personal boundaries, the difference between people and trust in parents, that's all
Personal boundaries, trust, etc. this is what parents talk about with their children themselves, it has always been, is and will be.
Or maybe in the light of the fact that children are not afraid to tell their parents, it is necessary to conduct classes not to educate children who, in the light of their young age, do not yet have moral principles and social relationships, can it be better to teach parents how to establish a trusting relationship with children?
Wonderful article.
It is extremely correctly noted that the so-called sex education under the auspices of the UN and left-liberal organizations actually sexualizes and corrupts children, and does not set itself the task of protecting them from diseases or promiscuity.
In Germany, for example, sex education is introduced into the school curriculum, and in such lessons, children aged 6+ get acquainted with contraception, how to use it and practice it on artificial mannequins, what types of sex exist and stuff like that. For the most part, proponents of sex education simply do not understand what they are defending and what they want for other people's children. They usually don't have their own.
Surveys on the Internet in general can only cover a sample of those who use the Internet, although we still have many people from the generation that do not use it and therefore the sample is not representative enough. Plus this is a face book. The Facebook poll only characterizes the Facebook audience. But these results cannot be extrapolated to all Russians