What is Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is one of the most visited Internet sites, which presents itself as an "encyclopedia" and is accepted by many non-specialists as well as schoolchildren as an unquestioning source of truth. The site was launched in 2001 by an Alabama entrepreneur named Jimmy Wales. Before founding the Wikipedia site, Jimmy Wales created the Internet project Bomis, which distributed paid pornography, a fact that he diligently strives to remove from his biography (Hansen 2005; Schilling xnumx).

Many people think that Wikipedia is trustworthy because anyone can edit it, but in fact this website presents the point of view of its most persistent and regular editors, some of which (especially in the areas of social controversy) are activists seeking to influence public opinion. . Despite its official policy of neutrality, Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias and an openly leftist bias¹. In addition, Wikipedia is heavily influenced by paid public relations and reputation management professionals who remove any negative facts about their customers and present biased content. Although such paid editing is not allowed, Wikipedia does little to comply with its rules, especially for large donors.

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Zanger, who left the project, recognizedthat Wikipedia does not follow its policy of neutrality. About 300 Wikipedia engagement examples are documented on the site:Canned food”, Created by indignant conservative Americans to communicate everything that Wikipedia is silent about.

Although Wikipedia assures that there is no censorship on the site, in fact, there is. All Wikipedia articles on the topic of LGBT* are under the watchful eye of activists, and any facts that are not to their liking are immediately deleted under the pretext «Marginal theories not generally recognized among scientists ". The mediation regime is mandatory for all LGBT* articles, and it is the mediator who decides what will be published and what will not - this is rule Wikipedia.

Thus, all Wikipedia articles related to LGBT* are written in a biased, self-serving manner, and are merely a compilation of carefully edited half-truths from secondary sources (what is called “let the goat into the garden”). It is impossible not only to add a new article, or make additions to an existing article, but even to change a single word if it contradicts the thesis “if it’s LGBT*, then it’s good.” For example, an attempt to remove from the sentence “Homosexuality was unreasonably considered a mental disorder” word "Unreasonably", since there were and are good clinical and empirical reasons to consider it as such, it was instantly suppressed under the standard pretext: Mainstream Science - WHO and APA don't count homosexuality by rejection, which means that all other opinions are not substantiated, and represent Marginal theories ”... That the WHO is a bureaucratic and not a scientific organization, that the APA is just a trade union whose policy on sexuality and gender is determined exclusively by its 44 departmentknown as “Society for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Studies” and consisting of them, and the fact that the change in the attitude of psychiatry to homosexuality was achieved not by new discoveries of science, but by the raising of hands of 13 gentlemen of dubious orientation from the APA board of directors does not bother anyone. The decision is not subject to appeal.

On his website, Dr. Nicolosi says about long and futile attempts to remove defamatory information about his therapeutic methods from the Wikipedia article. The article alleged that Nicolosi forces his patients to give up opera and museums, attend church, imitate the gait and manner of speaking of “straight people,” etc. Whenever he corrected these false statements, his edits were quickly reverted by the activist author, who reverted them to their original form, citing a non-existent source.

Wikipedia has long had a myth about the “1500 homosexual animal species” launched by an employee of the Norwegian Museum of Natural History. is he introduced him to Wikipedia in 2007 and only 11 years later, being edged against a wall by an editor from the group “Science for the truth", Failed to provide a source and admitted his mistake:

“I’ve been searching for two weeks now, but I can’t find a definitive list of 1500 species. I cannot otherwise conclude that I must have made an error in writing the original exhibition text, perhaps by combining two matching lists from different books, or by counting the same list twice. Thus, the factual content of the statement that “homosexuality has been observed in 1500 species” made at the opening of the exhibition in 2002 was erroneous.”

However, many major media outlets, gay propaganda manuals and even books contain this unverified information, demonstrating the lack of reliance on scientific information and the impact of Wikipedia on public opinion.

The Wikipedia editor who helped fix this error, have limited in the ability to edit Wikipedia, both for this correction and for adding information about the oncological consequences of a homosexual lifestyle to the article “Homosexuality.” At the moment, LGBT* mediation sabotage adding information about LGBT* health.

Как declares Wikipedia itself:

“We don't have freedom of speech. US law prohibits government censorship, but does not prevent public charities such as the Wikimedia Foundation from deciding for themselves what words and images are presented on its website and how.”

For this reason, when reading Wikipedia articles, be aware of their vulnerability, be critical of what you read, and always check your facts and sources. Articles on LGBT* topics are best read from the talk pages, where gay activists have been trying for months to block the addition of scientific information that refutes their views.

Some of these pages:
•  Homosexuality
•  Homophobia
•  Behavioral Immune System
•  Homosexuality and the mental norm
Homosexual plan
Antisperm antibodies (tried remove)
Homosexual behavior in animals
Homosexuality and pedophilia (tried remove)
Reparative therapy

Wikipedia makes our life easier and no worse than other online encyclopedias. This is a good resource if you need to quickly check a generally accepted fact and get a general idea of ​​a phenomenon, but remember that this is just a starting point and you can’t end there. Do not use Wikipedia materials for criticism or for arguments in a dispute, do not take them as a basis, and do not refer to them in educational, scientific and journalistic texts.

We are forced to reproach Russian scientists for their passive silence (in scientific publications), which can be equated to betrayal, because they understand that social changes depend on events in the scientific community, especially in the fields of psychiatry and psychology, where, under pressure from LGBT* activists on scientists, more and more psychosexual disorders are recognized as the norm and promoted as normal behavior: first homosexuality, then transsexualism and sadomasochism with pedophilia, which does not cause concern to the patient. What's next?


¹ The left side of the political spectrum refers to progressive (as opposed to conservative) liberal-reformist ideologies whose stated goals are “equality and social justice.” The left supports collectivism, increased state control, a more unisexual society, globalism, transnationalism, feminism, LGBT*, same-sex “marriage,” taxpayer-funded abortion, and censorship of religion in public places. The Modern Left undergo increasingly criticized as proponents of conformism, control of thought and intolerance of dissent.

Additionally

3 thoughts on “What is Wikipedia?”

  1. I would point out a few factual errors in the article.
    1) “Wikipedia claims to be trustworthy because anyone can edit it” – Wikipedia claims to be NOT trustworthy. Yes, exactly for the reason stated.
    2) “Wikipedia is heavily influenced by paid public relations and reputation management specialists” – Wikipedia has a rule introduced by its founder, the Wikimedia Foundation (that is, not subject to override by any local community consensus) that an editor who makes edits for a fee , must publicly declare this under threat of an indefinite ban on editing.

  2. Wikipedia is full of controversy, as here, do not reflect the essence of androphilic and gynophilic, where the first is collectivism and the second is individualism

Comments are closed.