20% of transgender people regret “gender reassignment” and their number is growing

«I needed help
head, not my body. "

According to recent data from the UK and the US, 10–30% of newly transitioned people stop transitioning within a few years of starting to transition.

A new study from Germany poses a serious challenge to the assumption that "gender dysphoria" is permanent in adolescents and young adults. German insurance data, containing medical records of approximately 14 million insured individuals aged 5 to 24, shows that over 60% of young people diagnosed with gender identity disorder (F64) no longer have the diagnosis after 5 years!

The development of feminist movements gave impetus to the formation of the pseudoscientific theory of "gender", which claims that differences in interests and abilities between men and women are determined not by their biological differences, but by upbringing and stereotypes that a patriarchal society imposes on them. According to this concept, “gender” is the “psychosocial sex” of a person, which does not depend on his biological sex and does not necessarily coincide with it, in connection with which a biological man can psychologically feel himself as a woman and perform female social roles, and vice versa. Adepts of the theory call this phenomenon "transgender" and claim that it is absolutely normal. In medicine, this mental disorder is known as transsexualism (ICD-10: F64).

Needless to say, the entire “gender theory” is based on absurd unsubstantiated hypotheses and unfounded ideological postulation. It simulates the presence of knowledge in the absence of such. However, in recent years, the spread of “transgender”, especially among adolescents, has become an epidemic. It's obvious that social contamination in combination with various mental and neurological disorders, it plays an essential role in this. The number of young people willing to “change sex” has increased in recent years tenfold and reached a record level. For an unknown reason, 3/4 of them are girls.

Read more "

Appeal: Protect Russia's Scientific Sovereignty and Demographic Security

14.07.2023/XNUMX/XNUMX. gender reassignment law accepted in the third and final reading. In addition to the fact that a ban is introduced on any medical manipulations for this purpose, it is now forbidden to adopt children to persons who have changed their sex, and the very fact of such a transformation of one of the spouses is the basis for divorce. An exception is made for cases of congenital anomalies, genetic and endocrine diseases that require such treatment, the decision to start which is made not by the doctor alone, but by the medical commission of a medical institution subordinate to the Ministry of Health.

On July 24.07.2023, XNUMX, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law banning gender reassignment in Russia, except in cases where it is necessary to treat congenital anomalies in children.

This is not enough to comprehensively solve the problem. See section What to do.

This appeal was supported by more than 50000 people, including the regional ministries of health.

The Congress of Russian Psychiatrists, which discussed ICD-11 issues, took place ( https://psychiatr.ru/events/833 ). War has been declared on Russian psychiatry (and it looks like Russia is winning!).

Dear scientists, public figures, politicians!

LGBT* parades, same-sex adoptions, homosexual “marriages,” self-mutilating “sex change” surgeries, and other such phenomena do not just happen. They are a carefully thought-out and deliberate process that begins with the depathologizing of mental disorders and changing the scientific status quo. Such paradigm shifts usually escape public attention because they occur within the framework of specialized events among a narrow circle of people. Taking scientific discussions that are important to society out of these narrow frameworks will help both impartial medical professionals and the entire society to defend scientific credibility, sovereignty, and demographic security of Russia.

Anyone who supported this appeal can stand between the harmful diktat of political correctness of the West and the future of Russia, protecting children and future generations from deliberate depopulation.

Read more "

LGBT* Movement Rhetoric in Light of Scientific Facts

This report presents a meticulous review of scientific evidence that refutes the myths and slogans promoted by LGBT* activists who postulate that homosexuality is a normal, universal, innate, and immutable condition. This work is not "against homosexual people" (as proponents of the false dichotomy will inevitably claim ), but rather " for them," as it focuses on the hidden problems of the homosexual lifestyle and respect for their rights, specifically the right to access accurate information about their condition and the associated health risks, the right to make choices, and the right to receive specialized therapeutic care to overcome this condition, if they are interested.

Content

1) Do homosexual individuals represent 10% of the population? 
2) Are there "homosexual" individuals in the animal kingdom? 
3) Is homosexual attraction congenital? 
4) Can homosexual attraction be eliminated? 
5) Is homosexuality associated with health risks? 
6) Is hostility to homosexuality a phobia? 
7) "Homophobia" - "latent homosexuality"? 
8) Are homosexual drives and pedophilia (sex drive for children) related? 
9) Are gay rights violated? 
10) Is homosexuality linked to sexual licentiousness? 
11) Was homosexuality the norm in ancient Greece? 
12) Are there any risks for children brought up in same-sex couples? 
13) Is the “normativeness” of homosexual attraction a scientifically proven fact? 
14) Was homosexuality excluded from the list of sexual perversions by scientific consensus? 
15) Is “modern science” impartial to the issue of homosexuality?

Read more "

Is “homophobia” a phobia?

V. Lysov
E-mail: science4truth@yandex.ru
Most of the following material is published in an academic peer-reviewed journal. Modern studies of social problems, 2018; Volume 9, No.8: 66 – 87: V. Lysov: “The fallacy and subjectivity of the use of the term“ homophobia ”in scientific and public discourse”.
DOI: 10.12731/2218-7405-2018-8-66-87.

Key findings

(1) A critical attitude towards homosexuality does not meet the diagnostic criteria of a phobia as a psychopathological concept. There is no nosological concept of “homophobia”, it is a term of political rhetoric.
(2) The use of the term “homophobia” in scientific activity to denote the entire spectrum of critical attitude to same-sex activity is incorrect. The use of the term “homophobia” blurs the line between a conscious critical attitude to homosexuality based on ideological beliefs and forms of manifestation of aggression, shifting associative perception towards aggression.
(3) Researchers note that the use of the term “homophobia” is a repressive measure directed against those members of society who do not accept the consolidation of a homosexual lifestyle in society, but who do not feel hatred or unreasonable fear of homosexual individuals.
(4) In addition to cultural and civilizational beliefs, the basis for a critical attitude to same-sex activity, apparently, is behavioral immune system biological reaction disgustdeveloped in the process of human evolution to ensure maximum sanitary and reproductive efficiency.

Read more "

Who needs gay marriage?

On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage, requiring all states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize such licenses issued in other jurisdictions. However, as data from the American polling institute Gallup shows, homosexuals are in no hurry to exercise their newly acquired rights. As expected, there was no influx of "oppressed sexual minorities" to registration offices, despite the complete elimination of "discriminatory" restrictions.

Read more "

MYTH: “Homosexuals make up 10% of the population”

Most of the material below is published in an analytical report. “The rhetoric of the homosexual movement in the light of scientific facts”. doi:10.12731/978-5-907208-04-9, ISBN 978-5-907208-04-9

“1 of 10 of you is one of us”

One of the slogans of the "LGBT*" movement is the claim that the proportion of people with homosexual attraction is supposedly 10% - that is, every tenth. In reality, according to large-scale modern studies conducted in the United States and the European Union (that is, in countries where homosexuality has comprehensive support and protection from the state apparatus), the proportion of people identifying themselves as homosexuals varies from <1% to a maximum of 3%.

Read more "

History of the exclusion of homosexuality from the list of psychiatric disorders

The point of view currently accepted in industrialized countries according to which homosexuality is not subject to clinical assessment is conditional and devoid of scientific credibility, because it reflects only unjustified political conformism, and not a scientifically reached conclusion.

Read more "

Dear deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation!


Recently in Russia there has been an explosive growth in applications from young people and teenagers for "sex change". Initiation to this idea occurs as a result of exposure to adolescents aggressive LGBT* propaganda in the Internet. Then teenagers, due to age characteristics, easily infect each other with this obsession under the guidance of curators and manipulators.

The first answers of deputies.
Read more "

LGBT* sect. Please help!

The Science for Truth group is increasingly receiving requests from parents who have lost contact with their children due to their involvement in the LGBT* movement. It's difficult for the average person to comprehend such a loss, but the tears and suffering of these unfortunate parents can help them understand the madness that is unfolding. Here's another story that could happen to any family, even a happy one.

*LGBT* movement recognized as an extremist organization!

Briefly about the son: smart, he grew up as a capable boy, obedient, cheerful, had many friends, always helped his parents. All the years I studied for one five. He studied 5 languages ​​at the same time, graduated with two gold medals and participated in the All-Russian Olympiads. He loved sports, went skiing for 2 years, volleyball for 2 years, at the age of 15 he ran 2 times a week for 15 km.

Read more about the story in the video

Read more "

How LGBT* Scientists Falsify Conclusions of Reparative Therapy Research

In July 2020, John Blosnich of the Center for LGBTQ+ Health Equity published another study on the "dangers" of reparative therapy. After surveying 1518 non-transgender sexual minorities, Blosnich's team concluded that individuals who had undergone sexual orientation change (SOCE) reported higher rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts than those who had not. They argued that SOCE represents a "harmful stressor that increases suicidality in sexual minorities." Therefore, attempts to change orientation are unacceptable and should be replaced with "affirming care" that helps individuals reconcile their homosexual tendencies. The study was called "the most compelling evidence yet that SOCE causes suicide."

Read more "

In Germany, prosecutors prosecute professor for criticizing gender theory

We previously wrote about German evolutionary scientist Ulrich Kutscher, who was brought to trial for daring to question the pseudoscience underlying LGBT* ideology and gender theory. After several years of legal ordeals, the scientist was acquitted, but the case didn't end there. Recently, he informed us that the prosecutor's office is attempting to overturn the acquittal and reopen the case, this time with a different judge. Below, we publish a letter sent to us by the professor. According to him, he has repeatedly consulted the scientific materials collected on the "Science for Truth" group website and in Viktor Lysov's book "The Rhetoric of the Homosexual Movement in Light of Scientific Facts," which he considers one of the most valuable resources.

Read more "

Family values ​​as an instrument of Russia's foreign policy

The article reveals the problem of protecting traditional family values ​​in the modern world. Family and family values ​​are the foundation on which society is built. Meanwhile, starting from the second half of the twentieth century, tendencies aimed at the destruction of the traditional family have been deliberately spread in some Western countries. Even before the end of the Great Patriotic War, a new war began - a demographic one. Under the influence of the thesis about the overpopulation of the Earth, methods of reducing the birth rate developed by demographers began to be introduced. In 1994, the UN International Conference on Population and Development was held, where the measures taken over the past 20 years to solve "demographic problems" were assessed. Among them were "sex education", abortion and sterilization, "gender equality". The policy of reducing the birth rate considered in the article, active propaganda of childlessness and non-traditional forms of relations contradicts the strategic interests of the Russian Federation, whose population is already rapidly declining. Russia, it seems, must resist the indicated tendencies, defending the traditional family and introducing measures to support it at the legislative level. The article proposes a number of decisions that must be made on the external and internal contour of public policy in order to protect traditional family values. By implementing this program, Russia has every chance of becoming the leader of the pro-family movement in the world.
Keywords: values, sovereignty, depopulation, fertility, foreign policy, family.

Read more "

An open letter to Rospotrebnadzor about "seksprosvet"

Project 10, which takes its name from the myth that one in ten people is homosexual, was founded in 1984 in Los Angeles. The goal of the project, according to the lesbian teacher Virginia Uribe, who founded it, is "to convince students, starting in kindergarten, to accept homosexual behavior as normal and desirable." She said that it was necessary to use state courts to force schools to spread information about homosexuality. According to her, "children should hear this, from kindergarten to high school, because the old idea of ​​talking about it in high school does not work."
She admitted: “This is a war ... As for me, there is no place for considerations of conscience. We must fight this war ".

Read more "

Scientific Information Center