Wikipedia is one of the most visited Internet sites, which presents itself as an "encyclopedia" and is accepted by many non-specialists as well as schoolchildren as an unquestioning source of truth. The site was launched in 2001 by an Alabama entrepreneur named Jimmy Wales. Before founding the Wikipedia site, Jimmy Wales created the Internet project Bomis, which distributed paid pornography, a fact that he diligently strives to remove from his biography (Hansen 2005; Schilling xnumx).

Many people think that Wikipedia is trustworthy because anyone can edit it, but in fact this website presents the point of view of its most persistent and regular editors, some of which (especially in the areas of social controversy) are activists seeking to influence public opinion. . Despite its official policy of neutrality, Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias and an openly leftist bias¹. In addition, Wikipedia is heavily influenced by paid public relations and reputation management professionals who remove any negative facts about their customers and present biased content. Although such paid editing is not allowed, Wikipedia does little to comply with its rules, especially for large donors.

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Zanger, who left the project, recognizedthat Wikipedia does not follow its policy of neutrality. About 300 Wikipedia engagement examples are documented on the site:Canned food”, Created by indignant conservative Americans to communicate everything that Wikipedia is silent about.

Although Wikipedia assures that there is no censorship on the site, in fact it is. All Wikipedia articles on the topic of LGBT people are under the watchful eye of activists, and any facts they dislike are instantly deleted under the pretext of «Marginal theories not generally recognized among scientists ". The mediation regime is mandatory for all articles of LGBT people, and it is the mediator who decides what will be published and what not - this is rule Wikipedia.

Thus, all Wikipedia articles related to LGBT people are biased, self-serving, and represent only a compilation of carefully edited half-truths from secondary sources (which is called "let the goat into the garden"). It is impossible not only to add a new article, or to make additions to an existing article, but even to change one single word if it contradicts the thesis "if it is LGBT, then it is good." For example, an attempt to remove from a sentence “Homosexuality was unreasonably considered a mental disorder” word "Unreasonably", since there were and are good clinical and empirical reasons to consider it as such, it was instantly suppressed under the standard pretext: Mainstream Science - WHO and APA don't count homosexuality by rejection, which means that all other opinions are not substantiated, and represent Marginal theories ”... That the WHO is a bureaucratic and not a scientific organization, that the APA is just a trade union whose policy on sexuality and gender is determined exclusively by its 44 departmentknown as “Society for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Studies” and consisting of them, and the fact that the change in the attitude of psychiatry to homosexuality was achieved not by new discoveries of science, but by the raising of hands of 13 gentlemen of dubious orientation from the APA board of directors does not bother anyone. The decision is not subject to appeal.

On his website, Dr. Nicolosi says about long and futile attempts to remove defamatory information about his therapeutic methods from the Wikipedia article. The article alleged that Nicolosi forces his patients to give up opera and museums, attend church, imitate the gait and manner of speaking of “straight people,” etc. Whenever he corrected these false statements, his edits were quickly reverted by the activist author, who reverted them to their original form, citing a non-existent source.

Wikipedia has long had a myth about the “1500 homosexual animal species” launched by an employee of the Norwegian Museum of Natural History. is he introduced him to Wikipedia in 2007 and only 11 years later, being edged against a wall by an editor from the group “Science for the truth", Failed to provide a source and admitted his mistake:

“I’ve been searching for two weeks now, but I can’t find a definitive list of 1500 species. I cannot otherwise conclude that I must have made an error in writing the original exhibition text, perhaps by combining two matching lists from different books, or by counting the same list twice. Thus, the factual content of the statement that “homosexuality has been observed in 1500 species” made at the opening of the exhibition in 2002 was erroneous.”

However, many major media outlets, gay propaganda manuals and even books contain this unverified information, demonstrating the lack of reliance on scientific information and the impact of Wikipedia on public opinion.

The Wikipedia editor who helped fix this error, have limited in the ability to edit Wikipedia, both for this correction and for the inclusion of information about the oncological consequences of a homosexual lifestyle in the article “Homosexuality”. Currently LGBT mediation sabotage adding LGBT health information.

Как declares Wikipedia itself:

“We don't have freedom of speech. US law prohibits government censorship, but does not prevent public charities such as the Wikimedia Foundation from deciding for themselves what words and images are presented on its website and how.”

For this reason, when scooping up information from Wikipedia articles, remember their vulnerability, be critical of what you read, and always check facts and sources. Articles about LGBT people are best read from the discussion pages, where many months of gay activists' attempts to block the addition of scientific information that refutes their point of view are unfolding.

Some of these pages:
•  Homosexuality
•  Homophobia
•  Behavioral Immune System
•  Homosexuality and the mental norm
• Homosexual plan
• Antisperm antibodies (tried remove)
• Homosexual behavior in animals
• Homosexuality and pedophilia (tried remove)
• Reparative therapy

Wikipedia makes our life easier and no worse than other online encyclopedias. This is a good resource if you need to quickly check a generally accepted fact and get a general idea of ​​a phenomenon, but remember that this is just a starting point and you can’t end there. Do not use Wikipedia materials for criticism or for arguments in a dispute, do not take them as a basis, and do not refer to them in educational, scientific and journalistic texts.

We are forced to reproach Russian scientists for passive silence (in scientific publications), which can be equated with betrayal, because they understand that social changes depend on events in the scientific environment, especially in the fields of psychiatry and psychology, where, under pressure from LGBT activists on scientists, everything more psychosexual disorders are recognized as the norm and are promoted as normal behavior: first homosexuality, then transsexualism and sadomasochism with pedophilia, which does not cause anxiety in the patient. What's next?.

---

¹ The left side of the political spectrum refers to progressive (as opposed to conservative) liberal reformist ideologies whose stated goal is “equality and social justice”. Leftists support collectivism, enhanced state control, a more unisexual society, globalism, transnationalism, feminism, LGBT people, same-sex “marriages”, taxpayer-funded abortions, and censorship of religion in public places. Modern left undergo increasingly criticized as proponents of conformism, control of thought and intolerance of dissent.

Additionally

Science scandal of the year: scientists write fake research to expose corruption of science

A significant portion of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may be a lie