Category Archive: Articles

Articles

Kocharyan G.S. - Bisexuality and conversion therapy: a case study

Annotation. A clinical observation is given where we are talking about “bisexual” to a man, and also describes the conversion therapy he was given using hypnosuggestive programming, which turned out to be very effective.

Currently, unprecedented efforts are being made to ban the use of conversion (reparative) therapy, which is aimed at changing the homosexual orientation of sexual desire to heterosexual. She is stigmatized and declared not only useless, but also extremely harmful to the human body. So, December 7, 2016 parliament of Malta unanimously passed a law prohibiting the use of reparative therapy. For “changing, suppressing and destroying a person's sexual orientation or gender identity,” this law provides for a fine or jail time. [7] The Bundesrat (representative of the federal states of Germany) on 5 June 2020 approved a law prohibiting this therapy. Deutsche Welle reports that its implementation can be punished with imprisonment for up to one year, and advertising and mediation - a fine of up to 30 thousand euros [1]. In the US, only 18 states, Puerto Rico and Washington DC, have banned conversion therapy for minors. Adults can volunteer for conversion therapy throughout the country [9]... Instagram and Facebook announced the blocking of all posts on these social networks that promote conversion therapy [8].

The assertions that conversion therapy is not only ineffective, but in all cases causes great harm to the body are false. The corresponding argumentation can be found in our articles [3; 4; 6]. Moreover, a number of our works have presented the effective use of conversion therapy [2; 5].

Here is a case from our clinical practice, where conversion therapy was very successful in correcting the direction of sexual desire in a man with bisexual preferences.

Read more "

20% of transgender people regret “gender reassignment” and their number is growing

«I needed help
head, not my body. "

According to the latest data UK and US, 10-30% of newly transitioned people stop transitioning within a few years of starting the transition.

New research from Germany poses a serious challenge to the assumption that “gender dysphoria” is permanent in adolescents and young adults. German insurance data, containing medical data of approximately 14 million insured persons aged 5 to 24 years, shows that more 60% young people diagnosed with gender identity disorder (F64) are no longer diagnosed after 5 years!

The development of feminist movements gave impetus to the formation of the pseudoscientific theory of "gender", which claims that differences in interests and abilities between men and women are determined not by their biological differences, but by upbringing and stereotypes that a patriarchal society imposes on them. According to this concept, “gender” is the “psychosocial sex” of a person, which does not depend on his biological sex and does not necessarily coincide with it, in connection with which a biological man can psychologically feel himself as a woman and perform female social roles, and vice versa. Adepts of the theory call this phenomenon "transgender" and claim that it is absolutely normal. In medicine, this mental disorder is known as transsexualism (ICD-10: F64).

Needless to say, the entire “gender theory” is based on absurd unsubstantiated hypotheses and unfounded ideological postulation. It simulates the presence of knowledge in the absence of such. However, in recent years, the spread of “transgender”, especially among adolescents, has become an epidemic. It's obvious that social contamination in combination with various mental and neurological disorders, it plays an essential role in this. The number of young people willing to “change sex” has increased in recent years tenfold and reached a record level. For an unknown reason, 3/4 of them are girls.

Read more "

Appeal: Protect Russia's Scientific Sovereignty and Demographic Security

14.07.2023/XNUMX/XNUMX. gender reassignment law accepted in the third and final reading. In addition to the fact that a ban is introduced on any medical manipulations for this purpose, it is now forbidden to adopt children to persons who have changed their sex, and the very fact of such a transformation of one of the spouses is the basis for divorce. An exception is made for cases of congenital anomalies, genetic and endocrine diseases that require such treatment, the decision to start which is made not by the doctor alone, but by the medical commission of a medical institution subordinate to the Ministry of Health.

On July 24.07.2023, XNUMX, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law banning gender reassignment in Russia, except in cases where it is necessary to treat congenital anomalies in children.

This is not enough to comprehensively solve the problem. See section What to do.

This appeal was supported by more than 50000 people, including the regional ministries of health.

The congress of Russian psychiatrists, at which ICD-11 issues were considered, took place (https://psychiatr.ru/events/833). Russian psychiatry declared war (looks like Russia is winning it!).

Dear scientists, public figures, politicians!

LGBT* parades, same-sex adoptions, homosexual “marriages,” self-mutilating “sex change” surgeries, and other such phenomena do not just happen. They are a carefully thought-out and deliberate process that begins with the depathologizing of mental disorders and changing the scientific status quo. Such paradigm shifts usually escape public attention because they occur within the framework of specialized events among a narrow circle of people. Taking scientific discussions that are important to society out of these narrow frameworks will help both impartial medical professionals and the entire society to defend scientific credibility, sovereignty, and demographic security of Russia.

Anyone who supported this appeal can stand between the harmful diktat of political correctness of the West and the future of Russia, protecting children and future generations from deliberate depopulation.

Read more "

Is homosexuality a mental disorder?

Discussion by Irving Bieber and Robert Spitzer

15 December 1973 The Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association, yielding to the continued pressure of militant homosexual groups, approved a change in the official guidelines for psychiatric disorders. “Homosexuality as such,” the trustees voted, should no longer be seen as a “mental disorder”; instead, it should be defined as “violation of sexual orientation”. 

Robert Spitzer, M.D., assistant professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University and a member of the APA nomenclature committee, and Irving Bieber, M.D., clinical professor of psychiatry at New York College of Medicine and chairman of the study committee on male homosexuality, discussed the APA's decision. What follows is an abridged version of their discussion.


Read more "

Gerard Aardweg on the psychology of homosexuality and ideological tyranny

World-renowned Dutch psychologist Gerard van den Aardweg has specialized in the study and treatment of homosexuality for most of his distinguished 50-year career. Member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the National Association for the Study and Treatment of Homosexuality (NARTH), author of books and scientific articles, today he is one of the few specialists who dare to disclose the inconvenient reality of this topic solely from factual positions, based on objective, not distorted ideological bias data. Below is an excerpt from his report “The Normalization” of Homosexuality and Humanae Vitae ”read out at the papal conference Academy of Human Life and Family in 2018 year.

Read more "

Are there any risks for children brought up in same-sex couples?

Most of the material below is published in an analytical report. “The rhetoric of the homosexual movement in the light of scientific facts”. doi:10.12731/978-5-907208-04-9, ISBN 978-5-907208-04-9

(1) Children raised by same-sex couples have an increased risk of developing homosexual attraction, sexual non-conformity, and accepting a homosexual lifestyle—these results have been obtained even in studies conducted by authors loyal to the LGBT*+ movement.
(2) The studies cited by LGBT*+ activists and affiliated organizations (defending the claim that there are no differences between children from traditional families and children raised by same-sex couples) have significant shortcomings. Among them are small samples, biased methods of recruiting respondents, short observation periods, lack of control groups, and biased formation of control groups.
(3) Studies conducted with large representative samples with a long observation period show that, in addition to the increased risk of adopting a homosexual lifestyle, children raised by homosexual parents are inferior to children from traditional families in a number of ways.

Read more "

Sexual "education" in schools - depopulation technology

From the filing RBC, Fontanka and other media outlets that do not represent the opinions of the majority of Russians, calls for the introduction of “sex education” in Russia began to spread like a whistle. In one of the groups of the social network Facebook (banned in the Russian Federation), a survey was even conducted, according to which “75% of Russians supported the idea of ​​​​introducing sex education lessons in schools.” It is noteworthy that only three quarters of these “Russians” had children. We hope that the organizers of this survey and those who voted will review the information provided here. data and will be able to balance their point of view.


Read more "